Huananzhi X99-8MD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHuananzhi X99-8MD3  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-8MD3
Memory59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200826
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateMay 21 '21 at 09:38
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 179
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 652
57% 485 Pts
64-Core 1,282
79% 1,282 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M5000
Nvidia(10DE 1152) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 7.5GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.1% Average
Lighting 58.2
Reflection 72.6
Parallax 64.7
47% 65.2 fps
MRender 62.7
Gravity 62.6
Splatting 65.8
52% 63.7 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
777GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR324 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1663 1641 1783 1798 1673 1597 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 1,787
Write 1,332
Mixed 1257
SusWrite 1,692
341% 1,517 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 54.7
166% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 505
DQ Write 402
DQ Mixed 570
395% 492 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 247%
Great: 370%
Seagate ST1500LM006 HN-M151RAD 1.5TB
865GB free
Firmware: 2BC10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 76 77 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 1.7
Write 60.5
Mixed 1.2
SusWrite 75.7
25% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 67%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 143 145 142 145 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 148
Write 129
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 144
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
273% 2 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386B4G70DM0-YK04 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
47.4% Average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 12
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.1
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-8MD3 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

System: Huananzhi X99-8MD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $400
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback