Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-2150 APU 16 User benchmarks, average bench 20% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.05 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Memory 19.5 1-Core 16.1 2-Core 31.2 14% 22.3 Pts	4-Core 30.4 8-Core 31.8 4% 31.1 Pts	64-Core 31.1 2% 31.1 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 840D) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.89% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 1.2 2% 2.07 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.89% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD3200AVJS-63WDA0 320GB 7,100 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 222GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.03A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 56 35 45 56 68 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 86.6 Write 91.5 Mixed 54.2 SusWrite 55.7 53% 72 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 165% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 1x8GB 726 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.93 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 324 12% 324 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 35%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
E1-2150 APUAMDBench 20%, 16 samples	1x

GPU
HD 8210AMDBench 1%, 4,832 samples	1x

RAM
EWB4GB681PAE-16IC 1x4GBUnknownBench 25%, 248 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16