Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory14.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1450 x 808 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190619
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 27 '21 at 21:13
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 73.7
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 187
67% 118 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 351
47% 350 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID M60-4Q
Nvidia(10DE 114F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 412.31
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
52% Above average
Lighting 64.2
Reflection 68.1
Parallax 64.6
52% 65.6 fps
MRender 55.7
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 65.8
52% 62.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 64GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 38 39 41 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 161
Write 76.7
Mixed 130
SusWrite 38.1
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 6
1,078% 6.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-4096MB 20GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 55.3
MC Mixed 49.9
138% 48.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 15.6
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,004 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback