Today's hottest deals

Asus A68HM-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus A68HM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '21 at 14:47
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 65
1-Core 64.1
2-Core 103
48% 77.3 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 151
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Zotac(19DA 4255) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.8% Below average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 36.1
Parallax 54.6
32% 43.3 fps
MRender 51.8
Gravity 48.6
Splatting 38.7
37% 46.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team L5 LITE SSD 120GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1222A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 34 19 4.1 7.9 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 363
Write 56.8
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 20
24% 113 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 0.6
32% 8.67 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 80%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$15
62GB free
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 64 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 80.9
Write 75.3
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 63.8
48% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 10.5
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-PLUS Builds (Compare 503 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback