Supermicro X9DAi

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	23.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Supermicro X9DAi (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DAi
Memory	109.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130805
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 02 '21 at 21:02
Run Duration	427 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 827 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 76.4 1-Core 90.3 2-Core 180 66% 115 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 725 63% 540 Pts	64-Core 2,221 138% 2,221 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gainward(10B0 1C81) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.7% Poor	Lighting 30.1 Reflection 29.7 Parallax 28.5 24% 29.4 fps	MRender 34.5 Gravity 27.1 Splatting 21.6 22% 27.7 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BF18 180GB 121 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: SC02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 145 154 168 158 163 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	65% Good	Read 298 Write 204 Mixed 224 SusWrite 156 49% 221 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 68.7 4K Mixed 30.3 116% 42.1 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 124 108% 161 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 79%
Crucial_CT1024MX 1TB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 480GB free Firmware: MU03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 251 246 234 232 232 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	77% Very good	Read 345 Write 411 Mixed 299 SusWrite 242 73% 324 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 75.8 4K Mixed 36 126% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 136 125% 184 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 96%
St2000lm003 HN-M 2TB 970GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 104 103 103 104 102 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	11.6% Very poor	Read 104 Write 79.5 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 103 19% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 4% 1.47 MB/s

St2000lm003 HN-M 2TB 927GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 101 97 100 101 100 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	11.2% Very poor	Read 95.5 Write 73.5 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 100 18% 81.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.8 4% 1.87 MB/s

WDC WUH721816AL 16TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 11TB free Firmware: W232 SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 212 214 217 215 217 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 233 Write 212 Mixed 140 SusWrite 217 45% 201 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 14.7 4K Mixed 0.6 43% 12.7 MB/s	DQ Read 2.2 DQ Write 8 DQ Mixed 2.1 2% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 34%
Seagate ST8000NE001-2M71 8TB 6TB free Firmware: R001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 102 100 102 101 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	108% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 280 Mixed 286 SusWrite 101 65% 293 MB/s	4K Read 83.1 4K Write 58.1 4K Mixed 65 240% 68.7 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 150 117% 164 MB/s

WD WUH721414ALE6L4 14TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 9.5TB free Firmware: W07G SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 225 225 228 226 226 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 235 Write 236 Mixed 113 SusWrite 226 148% 202 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 2.7 496% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 133%
WD WD101EFAX-68LDBN0 10TB 282 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 6.5TB free Firmware: 0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 172 183 173 176 177 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	98.5% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 177 Mixed 113 SusWrite 176 116% 158 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 1.5 364% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 119%
Hitachi HUH721010ALE600 10TB 447 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 6.5TB free Firmware: R001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 101 101 101 100 100 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 69% Great: 135%
WD WD100EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB 394 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 6.5TB free Firmware: R001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 101 101 100 101 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 115%
WD WD100EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB 394 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 7TB free Firmware: R001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 105 105 104 104 103 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 115%
WD WD100EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB 2,620 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 7TB free Firmware: R001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 101 101 100 101 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Hitachi HUH721010ALE600 10TB 447 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 6.5TB free Firmware: R001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 103 101 103 102 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 69% Great: 135%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB 5,351 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4.5TB free Firmware: R001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 103 101 103 102 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 105%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180 4,231 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 4.5TB free Firmware: R001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 102 100 102 101 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1G70QH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1G70QH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1G70QH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1G70QH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1G70QH0- M393B1K70BH1- M393B1G70... 128GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	81.5% Excellent	MC Read 42.8 MC Write 27.6 MC Mixed 28.4 94% 32.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.6 24% 8.33 GB/s	Latency 87.5 46% 87.5 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DAi Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 45%

Yacht

System: Supermicro X9DAi

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	15x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v21stBench 64%, 1,265 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	7x
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	3x

RAM
EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 32GBElpidaBench 91%, 25 samples	12x
M393B2G70QH0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 200 samples	5x
M393B1K70DH0- 8x8GBSamsungBench 95%, 162 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $252

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16