Asrock X99 WS-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock X99 WS-E  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160816
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateJul 20 '17 at 16:34
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 74.7
1-Core 49
2-Core 92.8
46% 72.2 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 346
33% 272 Pts
64-Core 879
54% 879 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 136
Write 134
Mixed 146
105% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.08
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.65
160% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 108%
Msft Virtual Disk 268GB
190GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 161
Write 106
Mixed 107
93% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.59
148% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 77%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
134GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 147
Write 147
Mixed 90.2
95% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.27
80% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
62.1% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 21
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.8
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 WS-E Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X99 WS-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $653
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback