Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory	23.4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 23.4GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5540 5 User benchmarks, average bench 50% None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Memory 70.7 1-Core 65.3 2-Core 128 53% 88 Pts	4-Core 191 8-Core 205 26% 198 Pts	64-Core 241 15% 241 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 58%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Virtual HD 172GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.1.0 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 11.5 Mixed 1.8 5% 6.65 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Mixed 0 12% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 75%
Msft Virtual Disk 848GB 78GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.8 2.5 3 3 2.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.5% Poor	Read 72.2 Write 3.8 Mixed 7 SusWrite 2.7 16% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 29% 0.23 MB/s

Msft Virtual Disk 268GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 80GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2.5 2.6 3.1 3.1 2.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 50.6 Write 5.3 Mixed 10 SusWrite 2.8 12% 17.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 25% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 23GB 174 User benchmarks, average bench 60% null MHz 3968, 20032 MB Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.3% Below average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 12.4 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 7.5 21% 7.4 GB/s	Latency 99.7 40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 112%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,058x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	827x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325