Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 925-$150 5,211 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	22.1% Poor	Memory 26.1 1-Core 30.1 2-Core 40.9 20% 32.4 Pts	4-Core 107 8-Core 94.1 14% 101 Pts	64-Core 99.7 6% 99.7 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670 21,442 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sapphire(174B E100) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.73% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 6.4 Parallax 3.7 4% 4.8 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.6 4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.73% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 255GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 193 203 199 198 199 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46% Average	Read 201 Write 171 Mixed 143 SusWrite 195 40% 177 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 38.8 4K Mixed 13.8 68% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 34.1 53% 101 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5173CB0-CK0 8GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 7.5 20% 6.87 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 5.4 12% 4.27 GB/s	Latency 279 14% 279 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM