Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII HERO  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '18 at 03:13
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 230
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 523
60% 467 Pts
64-Core 611
38% 611 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.33
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Lighting 40.8
Reflection 40
Parallax 36.7
33% 39.1 fps
MRender 50
Gravity 36.7
Splatting 38.3
34% 41.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB
448GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 952
Write 975
Mixed 956
215% 961 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 31.1
162% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 45.5
DQ Write 437
DQ Mixed 167
151% 217 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 156%
Great: 313%
11GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 41.6
Write 11.2
Mixed 9.65
20% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 9.23
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.01
35% 3.08 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5173CB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
57.4% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.9
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII HERO Builds (Compare 3,806 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $633
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback