Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive89.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSamsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP350V5C-S0HTR
Memory7.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '21 at 23:41
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 84
1-Core 83
2-Core 164
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 211
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60%
Great: 58%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253LE240G 240GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 292 107 106 109 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 450
Write 189
Mixed 323
SusWrite 180
63% 285 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 41.7
155% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 219
183% 263 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC Builds (Compare 609 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $81
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback