Huananzhi X79-16D

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Huananzhi X79-16D (all builds)
Motherboard	HUANANZHI HUANANZHI X79-16D
Memory	123.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191013
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '21 at 14:58
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	AZE-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 2,388 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Memory 58.1 1-Core 76.7 2-Core 154 54% 96.2 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 614 53% 453 Pts	64-Core 1,568 97% 1,568 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K6000-$4,000 1,173 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Nvidia(10DE 1036) ≥ 4GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 452.39 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Lighting 61.7 Reflection 67.9 Parallax 75.7 50% 68.4 fps	MRender 68.4 Gravity 61.8 Splatting 50.9 48% 60.4 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 306GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3401103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 410 416 414 416 423 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	63% Good	Read 461 Write 27.8 Mixed 55.4 SusWrite 408 52% 238 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 19.2 4K Mixed 10.9 54% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 25.2 DQ Mixed 34.4 37% 64.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 102%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB 16,094 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2TB free Firmware: SC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 178 177 178 178 178 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 167 Mixed 75.1 SusWrite 177 107% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GB 1,639 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	93.4% Outstanding	MC Read 41.9 MC Write 38.8 MC Mixed 36.8 112% 39.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 5.2 18% 6.23 GB/s	Latency 133 30% 133 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	0.7"	1028 720	LNKA001 LNKG H2VA001

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79-16D Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 70%

Battleship

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

System: Huananzhi X79-16D

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	5x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v21stBench 74%, 880 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v21stBench 75%, 766 samples	3x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	6x
R9 Fury-XAMD $781Bench 59%, 8,241 samples	2x
GTX 780Nvidia $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples	1x

SSD
AN2 250NVMe-M.2/80 250GBAsgardBench 151%, 433 samples	2x
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCrucial $75Bench 200%, 52,084 samples	2x
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)WD $74Bench 277%, 114,373 samples	2x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70QH0- 64GBSamsungBench 113%, 10 samples	5x
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	2x
HMT31GR7BFR4C 4x8GBHynixBench 89%, 337 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $279

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16