Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X9DAi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemSupermicro X9DAi  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DAi
Memory57.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 23:16
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 53.5
1-Core 68.9
2-Core 137
49% 86.5 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 549
49% 412 Pts
64-Core 1,392
86% 1,392 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Lighting 187
Reflection 196
Parallax 190
152% 191 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 193
Splatting 131
124% 154 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 134%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
474GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 427 422 345 355 347 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 453
Write 422
Mixed 316
SusWrite 390
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 26.3
96% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 248
195% 270 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 133%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$80
167GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 118 118 118 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 105
Write 124
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 118
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$38
558GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 9.6 10 9.5 9.2 9.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT42GR7MFR4C 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 19.4
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 6.6
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 62: 10R 4G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
62% 27% 51 335 272 60 24.1" 1920 1200 DELF016 DELL U2410
Typical X9DAi Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro X9DAi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback