Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '21 at 09:44
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600KF-$100
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 75.9
1-Core 148
2-Core 289
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 960
94% 768 Pts
64-Core 1,121
69% 1,121 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29% Poor
Lighting 36.6
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 38.1
30% 38.5 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 27.1
27% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-512 512GB
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 457 459 462 462 370 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 476
Mixed 403
SusWrite 445
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 39.5
139% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 276
202% 261 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$40
522GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 186 185 186 187 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 171
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 185
98% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
366GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 28 36 35 27 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 40.9
Write 35.9
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 32
46% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 63%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
23GB free, PID 0210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 13 4.9 5 15 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 38.1
Write 34.5
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 8.6
34% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 49%
Multi-Reader -1 32GB
29GB free, PID 6368
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 90 90 90 86 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
48% Average
Read 138
Write 67.1
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 90
93% 78 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.9
209% 6.83 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 48%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.7% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 22.3
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 23.4
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 7 144 23.8" 1280 720 AUS24AF ASUS VP249
Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $459
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback