Asrock X99E-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99E-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 02 '21 at 04:35
Run Duration331 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.30GHz
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 66.1
1-Core 81.8
2-Core 177
61% 108 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 650
58% 488 Pts
64-Core 1,515
94% 1,515 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
XFX(1682 E580) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
43.8% Average
Lighting 54.6
Reflection 58.6
Parallax 83.7
44% 65.6 fps
MRender 58.7
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 41.6
42% 53.3 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 297 299 302 301 299 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 432
Mixed 434
SusWrite 307
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 51
167% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 350
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 105%
Great: 126%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
259GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 87 89 89 84 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 48.2
Write 76.2
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 86.2
48% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
119% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 71%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
3TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 146 147 146 143 145 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 155
Write 141
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 145
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GLOH22F-28 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 14.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 4: 0R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 2% 83 302 246 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0FEF SAMSUNG
History: Score 5: 1R 0G 0B | Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 6: 0R 2G 0B | Score 1: 0R 0G 1B | Score 4: 0R 1G 1B
Typical X99E-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99E-ITX/ac - $371

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,067
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback