Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	7.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '21 at 22:57
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	57.8% Above average	Memory 69.7 1-Core 93.1 2-Core 162 63% 108 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 396 40% 322 Pts	64-Core 413 26% 413 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 37,264 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	7.31% Terrible	Lighting 8.6 Reflection 50 Parallax 13.5 7% 24 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 10.6 Splatting 11.4 8% 9.33 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.31% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1002 512GB 4,269 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 543 590 571 598 489 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	130% Outstanding	Read 700 Write 620 Mixed 606 SusWrite 537 138% 616 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 86.8 4K Mixed 41.7 141% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 772 DQ Write 370 DQ Mixed 154 225% 432 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 197%
Seagate BUP Slim 2TB 10,173 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 29 31 30 30 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 34.5 Write 29.9 Mixed 31.4 SusWrite 28.6 23% 31.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GB 28,935 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (49^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.5% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 13.4 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 14.3 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 18: 2R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
18%	35%	23	83	6	60	15.5"	1536 864	LGD0563

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	1,836x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	979x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,360x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	946x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	508x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	1,156x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	406x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	380x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	587x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	377x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	135x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16