Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX705DT
Memory19.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '22 at 23:55
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
44.2% Average
Memory 52.7
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 124
51% 87.7 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 279
30% 236 Pts
64-Core 273
17% 273 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
5.88% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 59.9
Parallax 10.5
5% 25.7 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 10.3
7% 8.07 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.88%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
482GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 496 861 951 1039 1095 1119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,787
Write 1,583
Mixed 994
SusWrite 927
296% 1,323 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 43.8
120% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 311
231% 305 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 180%
Great: 329%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD CT16G4SFS8266.C8FB 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.2% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 12.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT Builds (Compare 504 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback