Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 T5600-$99 1,304 User benchmarks, average bench 31% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Memory 61.1 1-Core 17.9 2-Core 38.3 29% 39.1 Pts	4-Core 41.2 8-Core 39.6 5% 40.4 Pts	64-Core 41.4 3% 41.4 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon X1300 358 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Legend(17AA 2005) 64MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.561.0.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.16% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.4 Parallax 1.1 0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.16% Great: 0%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Drevo X1 SSD 240GB 2,789 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: P051 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 65 83 86 96 96 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.5% Poor	Read 118 Write 115 Mixed 111 SusWrite 79.9 24% 106 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 25.2 4K Mixed 11 46% 16.2 MB/s	DQ Read 93.9 DQ Write 82.4 DQ Mixed 93.3 68% 89.9 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 3.1 10% 3.43 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 3 8% 2.8 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM