Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 6820s

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 6820s  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30D7
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '18 at 14:20
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T5470
U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
36% Below average
Memory 66.4
1-Core 19.6
2-Core 36.4
31% 40.8 Pts
4-Core 36.3
8-Core 36.5
5% 36.4 Pts
64-Core 36.4
2% 36.4 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon X1300
HP(103C 30D7) 128MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.400.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.13% Terrible
Lighting 0.23
Reflection 0.31
Parallax 0.25
0% 0.26 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.13%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHY2160BH 160GB-$48
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 890B Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
22% Poor
Read 37.9
Write 38.6
Mixed 26.9
26% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.27
4K Write 0.99
4K Mixed 0.19
50% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
14% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.17 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6820s Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6820s

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $97
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback