Today's hottest deals

MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7976
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)  (all builds)
Memory43.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '21 at 06:13
Run Duration360 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 93.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 642
63% 517 Pts
64-Core 684
42% 684 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Lighting 64.5
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 61.9
53% 65 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 62.9
Splatting 53.7
50% 61.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
736GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1294 1617 1685 1818 1796 1734 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 1,647
Write 1,217
Mixed 910
SusWrite 1657
305% 1,358 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 58
173% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 964
DQ Write 658
DQ Mixed 916
655% 846 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 258%
Great: 372%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$95
80GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 142 127 126 137 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 352
Write 207
Mixed 222
SusWrite 132
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 32.8
125% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 159
126% 174 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 85%
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
155GB free
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 189 155 139 169 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 394
Write 393
Mixed 337
SusWrite 163
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 37.3
135% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 197
187% 290 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 97%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
183GB free
Firmware: U21010RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 178 181 173 172 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 343
Write 335
Mixed 229
SusWrite 171
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 15.2
96% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 111
121% 198 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 86%
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$50
789GB free
Firmware: N1007C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 183 185 178 178 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
60% Above average
Read 289
Write 241
Mixed 224
SusWrite 176
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 23.6
84% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 188
162% 237 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 60%
Great: 105%
Seagate Expansion SW 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: 1801
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 146 154 152 158 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 124
Write 152
Mixed 130
SusWrite 155
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.8
344% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 89%
Hitachi HTS 721010A9E630 1TB
662GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 81 84 87 92 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 39.9
Write 73.3
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 86
41% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
49% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 76%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
533GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 20 22 26 22 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 105
Write 18.3
Mixed 13.9
SusWrite 25
29% 40.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 107%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00RWYB1 6TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 147 123 87 103 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 77.1
Write 68.1
Mixed 40.4
SusWrite 124
106% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 62%
WDC WD60 EDAZ-11BMZB0 6TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 43 41 44 49 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 90.3
Write 63
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 43.3
78% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
33% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 70%
WDC WD60 EDAZ-11BMZB0 6TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 121 125 125 124 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 121
Write 86.1
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 128
130% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.5
200% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 70%
WDC WD60 EDAZ-11BMZB0 6TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 61 63 64 62 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 114
Write 94
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 61
105% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.2
192% 2 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 32.4
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 28.7
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 102%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 21.5" 1280 720 WEH0000 WH22FX9019
Typical Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976) Builds (Compare 2,631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976) - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $710
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback