HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP EliteBook 8570w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 176B
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131008
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '21 at 00:54
Run Duration	260 Seconds
Run User	MAR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100 9,911 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Memory 72.3 1-Core 94.9 2-Core 178 66% 115 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 354 38% 304 Pts	64-Core 366 23% 366 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1000M 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 176B) 2GB CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.73 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	2.83% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 5.3 Parallax 4.3 3% 4.43 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 5 Splatting 0.3 2% 3.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.83% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Thinklife ST600 240G 240GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0424A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 2.5 16 43 5.3 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	32.2% Below average	Read 450 Write 378 Mixed 20.1 SusWrite 72.9 51% 230 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 9.6 4K Mixed 0.7 28% 8.2 MB/s	DQ Read 93.2 DQ Write 10.6 DQ Mixed 0.7 14% 34.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 105%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 107GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 60 60 58 61 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Read 80 Write 103 Mixed 54.2 SusWrite 59.1 54% 74.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.5 159% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 10.3 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 12.1 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 96.2 42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 15: 2R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
15%	6%	87	65	47	60	15.6"	1536 864	LGD0259

History: Score 5: 1R 0G 0B | Score 17: 2R 1G 4B | Score 15: 2R 1G 2B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 893 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	228x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	198x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	170x

GPU
Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples	495x
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples	297x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	37x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	39x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	20x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	20x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GBMicronBench 50%, 5,422 samples	17x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16