Asrock H91M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock H91M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140808
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '21 at 07:24
Run Duration	238 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G3240-$51 10,752 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Memory 60.1 1-Core 53.9 2-Core 58.2 39% 57.4 Pts	4-Core 65.4 8-Core 46.6 8% 56 Pts	64-Core 27.2 2% 27.2 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.8% Poor	Lighting 31.9 Reflection 43.7 Parallax 30.9 26% 35.5 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 38.1 Splatting 29.9 28% 35.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: 00RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 110 7 7.4 47 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	26.6% Poor	Read 334 Write 248 Mixed 248 SusWrite 67.9 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 8.8 29% 7.17 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 117GB free Firmware: KC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 91 96 99 97 99 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Read 96.1 Write 106 Mixed 55.3 SusWrite 93.5 64% 87.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CH9 8GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 13.4 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 10.5 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 127 31% 127 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 75: 9R 9G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
75%	68%	31	189	53	60	0"	1920 1080	LED MONITOR

History: Score 49: 4R 5G 14B | Score 75: 9R 9G 3B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H91M-PLUS Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H91M-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	7x
Core i3-4150Intel $42Bench 55%, 36,627 samples	6x
Core i3-4130Intel $42Bench 52%, 49,509 samples	6x

GPU
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	8x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	5x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $49Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	4x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	3x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	3x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	5x
99U5471-054.A00LF 0420 F3-1600C11-8GNT 16GBKingstonBench 54%, 25 samples	4x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $124

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16