Today's hottest deals

Asus A55BM-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus A55BM-E  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151215
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 24 '21 at 10:51
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 740K
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 55.9
1-Core 58.5
2-Core 100
43% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 133
15% 119 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
PwrHis(1787 2304) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 13.2
13% 12.1 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 11
Splatting 10.2
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CR10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 54 54 53 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 56.6
Write 56.8
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 53.5
38% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
26.3% Poor
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 9.8
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7.9
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A55BM-E Builds (Compare 114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A55BM-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback