Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 2 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DQ57TM
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100203
Uptime34.5 Days
Run DateJun 28 '22 at 07:04
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 880
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 173
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 381
45% 347 Pts
64-Core 379
24% 379 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 375A) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 5.1
4% 5.33 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 4
Splatting 6.9
5% 5.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.11%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$34
543GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 20 13 21 28 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 79.2
Write 67.2
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 26.5
45% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 112%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
149GB free
Firmware: CR100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 33 28 32 37 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 39
Write 27.4
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 37.5
25% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 13
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 12.1
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback