Samsung 760XBE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSamsung 760XBE  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT760XBE-X58
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191104
Uptime10.1 Days
Run DateJul 27 '21 at 03:51
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 28%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 179
63% 112 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 400
44% 350 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Sanyo(144D C822) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7324
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.59% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 25.3
Parallax 3.2
2% 10.4 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.59%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000 256GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD72K1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,391
Write 717
Mixed 862
218% 990 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 51.5
172% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 591
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 473
349% 465 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 249%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
169GB free, PID 8561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 6.8 5.6 5.1 5.3 5.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.9% Very poor
Read 36.6
Write 34.1
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 5.5
34% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 58%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 8561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 33 35 35 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 35.4
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 34
41% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 10.2
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 10.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 NCP0064
Typical 760XBE Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 760XBE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback