Average Bench: 39.5% (101st of 651)

Based on 2,552 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 1F91 Model: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

Poor average bench

The Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile Max-Q) averaged 60.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 50.2fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 37.9fps

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile Max-Q) is just 12.8%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile Max-Q) performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 42.1fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 43.5fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 2,552 samples)
Min Avg Max
39.4 Lighting 50.2 56.6
38.4 Reflection 52.4 58.5
31.9 Parallax 42.1 48.2
41.5% 48.2 fps
Min Avg Max
35.3 MRender 37.9 40.2
35.4 Gravity 43.5 47.3
37.3 Splatting 45.4 49.9
23.4% 42.3 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Legend(17AA 3802) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5730
Lighting 52.4
Reflection 83.6
Parallax 48.2
45% 61.4 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 47.9
Splatting 47.6
24% 44.3 fps
MSI(1462 129C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5671
Lighting 51.1
Reflection 56.3
Parallax 45.7
42% 51 fps
MRender 35.4
Gravity 44.9
Splatting 45
22% 41.8 fps
Asus(1043 156F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3187
Lighting 48.5
Reflection 54.7
Parallax 47.7
40% 50.3 fps
MRender 35.9
Gravity 43.5
Splatting 43.1
22% 40.8 fps
Asus(1043 156F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3187
Lighting 47.7
Reflection 54.6
Parallax 43.4
40% 48.6 fps
MRender 35.7
Gravity 43.4
Splatting 43.2
22% 40.8 fps
Asus(1043 156F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4294
Lighting 47.7
Reflection 54.1
Parallax 43.3
40% 48.4 fps
MRender 35.6
Gravity 43
Splatting 43
22% 40.5 fps
HP(103C 863E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5241
Lighting 48.7
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 44.9
38% 34 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 44.8
Splatting 44.2
23% 41.9 fps
HP(103C 863E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.41
Lighting 42.2
Reflection 48.7
Parallax 44
35% 45 fps
MRender 34.4
Gravity 41.4
Splatting 39.9
21% 38.6 fps
2,552 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 35,860,133 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 2,552 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
MSI(1462 127E) 20% 41% ± 3%
Legend(17AA 229F) 12% 38% ± 3%
Asus(1043 156F) 11% 37% ± 3%
Microsoft(1414 0032) 11% 39% ± 6%
HP(103C 863E) 9% 37% ± 4%
Legend(17AA 3802) 9% 41% ± 3%
Legend(17AA 3806) 8% 42% ± 5%
MSI(1462 129C) 6% 40% ± 2%
Device(1A58 1001) 5% 39% ± 4%
Legend(17AA 3F1A) 5% 41% ± 2%
Sanyo(144D C822) 2% 38% ± 5%
Asus(1043 12CF) 1% 37% ± 2%
Send price feedback
Typical GTX 1650 (Mobile Max-Q) Builds (Compare 1,504 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular GTX 1650 (Mobile Max-Q) compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Excellent

4 months ago.

Outstanding for MadVR use on the go also, for us video-philes.


Excellent

5 months ago.

Great for FULL HD medium et high for some games !


Poor

1 month ago.

barely diferent for more expensive price


Excellent

19 days ago.

This GTX1650 Max-Q I have on my MSI notebook, its really quiet and is very fast.


Excellent

3 months ago.

Good graphics card in the price range


Poor

10 months ago.

It's the same thing as a mobile 1050 ti.


Excellent

15 months ago.

The sweet-spot for budget gaming laptops, this Turing-based 4GB mobile-specific card has a 45%+ lead over the outgoing GTX1050 mobile unit. There's not much more to say here, that's a massive uplift in a package that, when it comes to retail prices, generally only costs slightly more. In real terms these cards offer excellent 1080p gaming on the go, with very playable results in most modern titles like PUBG, Apex Legends, Battlefield, and many more. If you're into slower titles like Civilisation, Fallout, or Kerbal Space Program then this thing won't even flinch. To cut a long story short, this is an excellent buy for the money and is best paired with a hyperthreaded quad core or 6-core processor, SSD/NVME drive and 16GB dual channel RAM. Luckily, this is what most manufacturers are offering. Highly recommended bang-for-the-buck card!


Good

2 months ago.

Almost a desktop 1050 ti. In some benchmarks has higher scores than 1050 ti but in games actually does better than that gpu. Good gpu and can run games at high with some tweaks


Your
opinion?
651 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback