Samsung 950XCJ/951XCJ/950XCR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 950XCJ/951XCJ/950XCR  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP950XCJ-K01US
Memory0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210521
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJul 28 '21 at 21:13
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 88.6
2-Core 130
64% 102 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 419
40% 329 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Sanyo(144D C830) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.48% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 6.2
5% 5.2 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 7
Splatting 10.7
7% 7.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.48%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sn730 SDBQNTY-512G-1004 512GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11100104
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,830
Write 1,995
Mixed 1,568
402% 1,797 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 70.5
245% 91.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,014
DQ Write 597
DQ Mixed 516
462% 709 MB/s
Poor: 145% Great: 254%
SMI USB DISK 512GB
68GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 79 75 75 78 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 91.6
Write 80.9
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 74.6
105% 79 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 4.6
323% 6.73 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 43%
Rockbox Internal Storage 4GB
2GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
5.88% Terrible
Read 7
Write 1.7
Mixed 6
SusWrite 2.9
5% 4.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
76% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.88%
Great: 6%
Rockbox SD Card Slot 128GB
46GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.21% Terrible
Read 7
Write 3.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 0.4
5% 3.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
23% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.21%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.8% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 9.1
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 3.3
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 5 60 15.5" 1280 701 BOE0889
Typical 950XCJ/951XCJ/950XCR Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 950XCJ/951XCJ/950XCR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback