Asrock Z370M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z370M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '18 at 13:03
Run Duration610 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$177
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 146
2-Core 288
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 956
94% 767 Pts
64-Core 1,227
76% 1,227 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Lighting 45.8
Reflection 46.3
Parallax 35.5
37% 42.5 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 42.7
Splatting 37.3
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 2,714
Write 1,098
Mixed 1,273
371% 1,695 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 26.7
171% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 102
114% 192 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 236%
Great: 236%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 12TB
639GB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 195
Write 29.9
Mixed 81.5
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 2.68
4K Mixed 0.76
665% 5.39 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 212%
Rockbox SD Card Slot 64GB
2GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.79% Terrible
Read 7.4
Write 5.71
Mixed 6.34
8% 6.49 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 1.31
109% 2.05 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.79%
Great: 8%
Rockbox Internal Storage 4GB
1GB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
5.54% Terrible
Read 7
Write 3.53
Mixed 4.33
6% 4.95 MB/s
4K Read 2.95
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.82
73% 1.59 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.54%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
80.9% Excellent
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 25.1
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 25.7
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $443
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback