MSI K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 8% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	MSI MS-7309
Motherboard	MSI K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309) (all builds)
Memory	1.1 GB free of 1.01563 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101123
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 30 '21 at 19:51
Run Duration	271 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	57%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri) 19,471 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Memory 29.1 1-Core 33.1 2-Core 62.9 24% 41.7 Pts	4-Core 43.5 8-Core 56.1 6% 49.8 Pts	64-Core 41.2 2% 41.2 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 550M Asus(1043 83BE) 1,024MB Ram: 1,023MB, Driver: 306.97 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.3% Very poor	Lighting 10.1 Reflection 14.8 Parallax 2.5 8% 9.13 fps	MRender 12.6 Gravity 115 Splatting 10.8 35% 46 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 257GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 85 88 91 89 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 89.3 Write 58.8 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 88.4 54% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 58%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA 500GB 2,251 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 38 9.8 7.2 12 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	34% Below average	Read 99.4 Write 97.3 Mixed 47 SusWrite 18.8 48% 65.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 72%
HUAWEI SD Storage 32GB 98 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 29GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 2.1 1.1 3.2 2.8 3.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	1.68% Terrible	Read 6.5 Write 1.2 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 2.5 4% 3.67 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 3% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.68% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 1GB 800, 800 MHz 1024, 16 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.07 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 1.3 SC Mixed 1.7 4% 1.57 GB/s	Latency 260 15% 260 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 17: 2R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
17%	9%	58	51	24	60	32"	1920 1080	MST0030 MStar Demo

History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 17: 2R 2G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309) Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309)

CPU
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	4x
Athlon II X4 635AMDBench 45%, 5,306 samples	4x
Phenom 9550AMDBench 43%, 2,773 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce 6150SE nForce 430NvidiaBench 0%, 4,836 samples	8x
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	2x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	2x

SSD
360G B 360GBSSDBench 47%, 40 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	3x
NT2GT64U8HD0BY-AD 2x2GBNanyaBench 14%, 164 samples	2x
OCZ2VU6672G OCZ2VU6672G 4GBUnknownBench 21%, 7 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16