bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DH87RL
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '21 at 11:08
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 194
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 377
50% 377 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.4% Average
Lighting 63
Reflection 57.1
Parallax 86.1
51% 68.7 fps
MRender 59.6
Gravity 68.2
Splatting 43.8
46% 57.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-128M6S-HP 128GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 705
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 394
Write 261
Mixed 260
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 32.1
114% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 208
189% 289 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 99%
Seagate ST3500630NS 500GB-$53
116GB free
Firmware: K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 0 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 41.5
Write 46.5
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 7.1
24% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 0467 RMR5030MN68F9F1600 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.7% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 17" 1280 720 ACRAD46 AL1717
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback