bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory224GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 224GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory219.4 GB free of 224 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '21 at 00:11
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
None, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 202
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 770
70% 590 Pts
64-Core 1,206
75% 1,206 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 136GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 166 163 166 155 166 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 525
Write 142
Mixed 255
SusWrite 164
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 21.6
135% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 14.3
DQ Mixed 25.8
38% 77.9 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 78%
Virtual HD 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 348 352 349 360 349 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 524
Write 515
Mixed 514
SusWrite 351
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 33.7
108% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 192
145% 194 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 224GB
null MHz
1024, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 31750 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 57.9
MC Write 52.4
MC Mixed 48.1
151% 52.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.7
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 130%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback