Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z97 Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Killer  (all builds)
Memory17.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140916
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 13 '21 at 00:57
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 155
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 270
32% 247 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.1% Average
Lighting 58.6
Reflection 68.6
Parallax 60.6
48% 62.6 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 61.9
Splatting 53.7
49% 60.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 53 49 30 17 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 175
Write 285
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 44.4
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 5.5
57% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 0.1
55% 130 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 86%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
606GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 87 90 90 92 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 95.5
Write 91
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 89.8
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 59%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 116 116 116 115 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 108
Write 87.5
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 114
125% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1.1
166% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
28.6% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 8.4
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 6.8
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 Killer Builds (Compare 1,197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Killer - $707

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $1,355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback