HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP EliteBook 8770w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 176C
Memory	20.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '21 at 14:00
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220 14,369 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Memory 54.8 1-Core 33.3 2-Core 66.3 33% 51.5 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 433 34% 299 Pts	64-Core 488 30% 488 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 HP(103C 176C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.1% Poor	Lighting 31 Reflection 35.8 Parallax 32 25% 32.9 fps	MRender 43.8 Gravity 31.5 Splatting 37.9 31% 37.7 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 72 81 83 64 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 217 Write 108 Mixed 291 SusWrite 93.8 40% 178 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 31.4 4K Mixed 17.7 66% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 250 DQ Mixed 37.3 79% 160 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 100%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 7GB free Firmware: GG2OACY0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 58 63 67 62 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 59.6 Write 53 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 59.2 35% 48.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 82% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 58%
ASMT 2115 120GB 614 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 26GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 103 130 100 77 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 244 Write 225 Mixed 208 SusWrite 101 255% 195 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 19.8 4K Mixed 15.1 1,229% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 16.6 DQ Write 24.7 DQ Mixed 18.1 1,517% 19.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 162%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 24GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	46.2% Average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.3 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 7 24% 8.37 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	17.3"	1280 720	LGD0383

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	100x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	93x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	83x

GPU
Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples	299x
Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples	95x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	26x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	35x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	14x
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	13x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 48%, 14,177 samples	20x
EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x8GBElpidaBench 51%, 682 samples	12x
HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 53%, 361 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363