Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX506LI
Memory	1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210202
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '21 at 20:14
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10300H 82,821 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Memory 88.3 1-Core 124 2-Core 235 84% 149 Pts	4-Core 433 8-Core 584 64% 508 Pts	64-Core 622 38% 622 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile) 33,798 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Asus(1043 1E91) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3060 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	46% Average	Lighting 57.3 Reflection 89 Parallax 54.7 47% 67 fps	MRender 65.2 Gravity 51.1 Splatting 49.8 45% 55.4 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB 10,140 User benchmarks, average bench 134% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: 21106000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,366 Write 874 Mixed 898 231% 1,046 MB/s	4K Read 39.8 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 49.9 187% 69.6 MB/s	DQ Read 683 DQ Write 748 DQ Mixed 560 465% 664 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 189%
Micron Crucial X8 SSD 500GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 152GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 59 59 57 59 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 369 Write 63 Mixed 30.7 SusWrite 58 28% 130 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 12.9 4K Mixed 14.2 64% 17.7 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 17.4 DQ Mixed 24.5 30% 57.2 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GB 20,126 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.1% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 9.2 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 8.5 23% 8.03 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 16: 3R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
16%	13%	30	106	5	60	23.8"	1920 1080	DELA0B3 DELL S2415H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI Builds (Compare 2,764 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples	2,413x
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples	323x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	27x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	1,530x
GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 42%, 33,798 samples	1,232x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 2,203 samples	1x

SSD
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	1,045x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	394x
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	354x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 45%, 34,565 samples	531x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	488x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples	366x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16