Biostar A320MH

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Biostar A320MH (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200715
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '21 at 16:54
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$97 52,721 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Memory 78.6 1-Core 114 2-Core 205 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 315 42% 315 Pts	64-Core 318 20% 318 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 1804 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Lighting 20.5 Reflection 21.6 Parallax 21.7 17% 21.3 fps	MRender 19.1 Gravity 21.5 Splatting 19.1 16% 19.9 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 19 19 13 40 13 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.1% Poor	Read 195 Write 93.7 Mixed 97.3 SusWrite 38.9 23% 106 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 23.3 4K Mixed 12.4 53% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 17.8 DQ Write 19 DQ Mixed 17.9 14% 18.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 89GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 120 128 131 130 125 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 138 Write 126 Mixed 31.1 SusWrite 127 76% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.C8FJ CT8G4DFRA266.C8FE 16GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	MC Read 37.1 MC Write 36.5 MC Mixed 33 102% 35.5 GB/s	SC Read 25.9 SC Write 37 SC Mixed 28.6 87% 30.5 GB/s	Latency 83.2 48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 57: 7R 4G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
57%	18%	119	241	190	75	21.7"	1920 1080	GSM5B55 LG FULL HD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,805 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	266x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	196x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	123x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	127x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	125x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	111x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	114x
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	76x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	46x

RAM
CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 78%, 40,300 samples	48x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	43x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GBTeamBench 78%, 7,481 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $338

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16