MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 100% UFO	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C35
Motherboard	MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210625
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 21 '21 at 10:13
Run Duration	354 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$245 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Memory 86.4 1-Core 143 2-Core 282 93% 170 Pts	4-Core 558 8-Core 1,000 94% 779 Pts	64-Core 2,124 131% 2,124 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 22,284 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 879C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.8% Average	Lighting 53.1 Reflection 53.6 Parallax 47.9 43% 51.5 fps	MRender 60.3 Gravity 47.5 Splatting 47.4 42% 51.7 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 253GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1957 1684 1448 1653 1631 1455 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 70%
Amd-raid Array 2 1TB 170 User benchmarks, average bench 243% 772GB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4420 4395 4401 4409 4389 3747 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	490% Outstanding	Read 2,566 Write 4,443 Mixed 1967 SusWrite 4,294 754% 3,317 MB/s	4K Read 56.7 4K Write 142 4K Mixed 72.9 254% 90.5 MB/s	DQ Read 815 DQ Write 1,290 DQ Mixed 1,032 787% 1,045 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 490% Great: 490%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 583GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 74 69 73 75 75 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 89 Write 86.5 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 72.6 53% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 59%
Amd-raid Array 4 1TB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 451GB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 71 74 76 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Read 70.5 Write 94.3 Mixed 59 SusWrite 73.7 55% 74.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 96%
SanDisk' Cruzer Fit 16GB 1,420 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 4GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 6.1 7.1 6.9 7.4 7.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 18.5 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 7.7 24% 19.7 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.3 157% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 19%
Verbatim STORE N GO 249GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 23GB free, PID 0243 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 0.1 2.6 3.8 30 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 257 Write 134 Mixed 65.3 SusWrite 6.9 125% 116 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 35% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 15,285 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 45.5 MC Write 37.4 MC Mixed 39.3 116% 40.7 GB/s	SC Read 27.5 SC Write 23 SC Mixed 36 82% 28.8 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 15: 0R 4G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
15%	37%	19	29	9	60	27"	2560 1440	AOC2701 Q27P1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 164%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 187%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) - $358

CPU
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	453x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $245Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	444x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	341x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	239x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	214x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	207x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	167x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $82Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	155x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $165Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	105x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	97x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	70x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,770

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $47	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16