Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics80.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive470% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '21 at 14:08
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700K-$240
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 189
2-Core 376
117% 220 Pts
4-Core 736
8-Core 1,387
126% 1,061 Pts
64-Core 1,848
114% 1,848 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 115%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.9% Excellent
Lighting 99.2
Reflection 111
Parallax 101
81% 104 fps
MRender 94.4
Gravity 102
Splatting 100
81% 98.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 613000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4291 4327 1245 1327 1489 1210 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
470% Outstanding
Read 3,208
Write 4,390
Mixed 3,225
SusWrite 2,315
742% 3,284 MB/s
4K Read 81.9
4K Write 280
4K Mixed 111
414% 157 MB/s
DQ Read 1,816
DQ Write 1,511
DQ Mixed 1,644
1,237% 1,657 MB/s
Poor: 264%
This bench: 470%
Great: 573%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
437GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 478 458 465 469 472 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 481
Mixed 413
SusWrite 470
106% 468 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 49
173% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 340
256% 344 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 118%
Great: 121%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 124
Write 30
Mixed 51
71% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.5
116% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-4800C17-8GTRS 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
110% Outstanding
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 49.6
MC Mixed 33.5
112% 39.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 45.5
SC Mixed 34.3
101% 35.3 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 110%
This bench: 110%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 72: 9R 9G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
72% 42% 43 285 189 144 34" 2293 960 AOC3402 U34G2G4R3
History: Score 74: 10R 8G 0B | Score 72: 9R 9G 0B
Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $642
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback