Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190731
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 22 '21 at 08:59
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 72.7 1-Core 96.9 2-Core 190 68% 120 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 362 50% 370 Pts	64-Core 375 23% 375 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 5,957 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 1B84) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Lighting 64.7 Reflection 66.6 Parallax 61.7 53% 64.3 fps	MRender 66.5 Gravity 67.4 Splatting 61.4 53% 65.1 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 30 107 56 64 99 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.9% Poor	Read 197 Write 97.3 Mixed 86 SusWrite 90.3 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 14.9 4K Mixed 10.9 42% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 15.6 DQ Write 16.6 DQ Mixed 14.8 12% 15.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 100%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60 23,997 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 303GB free Firmware: JE3OA50A SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 74 75 76 76 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Read 57.8 Write 62.7 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 74.2 42% 58 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GB 816 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	48% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 15.2 46% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 17.1 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 95.3 42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	60	23.8"	1280 720	PHLC17C PHL 246E9Q

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,000 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	870x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	715x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	544x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	456x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	425x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	404x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	204x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $52Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	155x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	149x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	131x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	127x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	114x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $348

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16