bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DH87RL
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180327
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateAug 29 '21 at 12:29
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 185
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 357
49% 364 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.8.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
49.9% Average
Lighting 63.8
Reflection 57.7
Parallax 85.6
52% 69 fps
MRender 60.6
Gravity 68.6
Splatting 44.1
46% 57.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-128M6S-HP 128GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 705
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 222 310 314 317 315 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 441
Write 314
Mixed 255
SusWrite 294
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 39.3
141% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 212
191% 291 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 99%
Seagate ST31000NSSUN1.0T 102758A75V 1TB
813GB free
Firmware: SU0F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 86 88 87 89 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.9% Above average
Read 90.5
Write 89.8
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 86.8
58% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5030MN68F9F1600 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.2
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 16
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 73.3
54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback