Lenovo IdeaCentre K320

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo IdeaCentre K320  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100608
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateAug 30 '21 at 05:32
Run Duration327 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 93
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 148
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 349
38% 301 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320
MSI(1462 1991) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.9
4% 2.97 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 3
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 137 58 56 51 52 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.7% Above average
Read 248
Write 204
Mixed 208
SusWrite 97
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 23.2
89% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 138
119% 175 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 95%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
931GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3FE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 139 138 131 110 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73% Very good
Read 127
Write 134
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 128
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 73%
Great: 74%
WD My Passport 259F 3TB
841GB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 25 18 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 26.1
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 23.1
34% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 49%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 1603
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 3.1 2.9 3.1 2.7 2.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.48% Terrible
Read 7.4
Write 2.2
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 2.9
4% 3.55 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.48%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
36.9% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.2
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 12.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 2R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 9% 44 28 20 60 64.5" 1536 864 VIZ1035 P65-F1
History: Score 5: 1R 0G 0B | Score 8: 1R 0G 3B | Score 5: 0R 1G 2B | Score 12: 2R 0G 2B
Typical IdeaCentre K320 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo IdeaCentre K320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $314
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback