HP ProBook 430 G1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 32% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP ProBook 430 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1946
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '21 at 23:46
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Memory 52.3
1-Core 16.8
2-Core 40.6
26% 36.6 Pts
4-Core 61.8
8-Core 63
8% 62.4 Pts
64-Core 61.6
4% 61.6 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin Chronos 240GB-$99
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 560ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 142 120 119 113 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 311
Write 202
Mixed 223
SusWrite 133
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 23.2
76% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 151
111% 145 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
27.1% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 11.7
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7.2
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 430 G1 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 430 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $370
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback