Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225 51,836 User benchmarks, average bench 49% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	53.6% Above average	Memory 74.1 1-Core 79.4 2-Core 136 58% 96.6 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 195 26% 194 Pts	64-Core 195 12% 195 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 2102) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.55% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 1.6 2% 2.2 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.6 1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.55% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BF240A5H REF 240GB 213 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: LWDi SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 33 68 168 99 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Read 352 Write 246 Mixed 268 SusWrite 102 54% 242 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 43.5 4K Mixed 24.4 87% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 293 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 163 142% 214 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 8GB 416 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 16.4 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 92.2 43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	336x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	21x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	14x

RAM
ASU1600S11-4G-EDEG 1x4GBKingstonBench 30%, 1,095 samples	30x
ASU1600S11-4G-EDEG 2x4GBKingstonBench 53%, 636 samples	30x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 17,632 samples	18x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $90

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16