Asrock 870 Extreme3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 870 Extreme3 (all builds)
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100914
Uptime	12.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '21 at 13:34
Run Duration	626 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	79%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 905e 349 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Memory 75.7 1-Core 35.8 2-Core 72 42% 61.2 Pts	4-Core 105 8-Core 104 14% 105 Pts	64-Core 99.8 6% 99.8 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185 33,175 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Sapphire(174B A003) CLim: 940 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.2% Below average	Lighting 40.2 Reflection 33.8 Parallax 50.9 33% 41.6 fps	MRender 30.3 Gravity 41.3 Splatting 23.5 25% 31.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 34%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 79 117 73 12 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 28.5 Write 89.7 Mixed 72.2 SusWrite 69.7 15% 65 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Mixed 8.6 40% 9.55 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 692GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete	Read 39.2 Mixed 14.5 20% 26.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 23% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF 8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 533, 533, 533, 533 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 9.8 28% 9.67 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 7.8 19% 6.5 GB/s	Latency 88.9 45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	72	23.5"	1280 720	SAM0D2C C24F390

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 870 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 870 Extreme3

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	15x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	8x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	7x

GPU
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples	4x
Radeon HD 7350AMDBench 1%, 193 samples	3x
R7 250AMDBench 8%, 25,802 samples	3x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x
Q300 120GBToshibaBench 70%, 1,888 samples	2x

RAM
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH0 F3-16000CL9-2GBRH0 4GBUnknownBench 31%, 4 samples	2x
99U5471-001.A00LF 99U5471-002.A00LF 99U5471-002.A00LF 6GBKingstonBench 50%, 4 samples	2x
KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBKingstonBench 42%, 629 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $111

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16