Average Bench: 8.62% (249th of 643)

Based on 18,186 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 6610 Models: AMD Radeon R7 200, ASUS R7 250

Terrible average bench

The AMD R7 250 averaged 91.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 31.2fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 31.8fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R7 250 is just 1.87%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD R7 250 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 29.5fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 45.4fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 18,186 samples)
Min Avg Max
0.2 Lighting 31.2 37
25.8 Reflection 29.5 33.8
42.1 Parallax 45.4 48.5
8.2% 35.4 fps
Min Avg Max
15 MRender 22 28.6
28.3 Gravity 31.8 33.7
21.2 Splatting 27.8 34.6
8.7% 27.2 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Asus(1043 0462) 1GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 30.4
Parallax 45.8
9% 37.2 fps
MRender 27.9
Gravity 32.4
Splatting 33.5
9% 31.3 fps
PwrHis(1787 2334) 1GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Lighting 34
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 48.2
9% 38 fps
MRender 28.8
Gravity 31.9
Splatting 34.3
9% 31.7 fps
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Lighting 32.6
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 46.4
9% 35.8 fps
MRender 17.2
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 23.5
9% 24.7 fps
XFX(1682 7250) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.8.1
Lighting 33.4
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 44.5
9% 34.9 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 31.8
Splatting 21.8
8% 23 fps
PwrHis(1787 2334) 2GB
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Lighting 31.5
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 43.2
8% 33.8 fps
MRender 16.9
Gravity 31.1
Splatting 22.9
8% 23.6 fps
XFX(1682 7250) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Lighting 30.2
Reflection 26.6
Parallax 44.4
8% 33.7 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 31.7
Splatting 21.3
8% 22.7 fps
MSI(1462 3011) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Lighting 31
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 42.6
8% 33.4 fps
MRender 17.3
Gravity 30.3
Splatting 22.5
8% 23.4 fps
Dell(1028 2120) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.8.1
Lighting 29.3
Reflection 28.1
Parallax 42.3
8% 33.2 fps
MRender 18.4
Gravity 27.5
Splatting 24.1
8% 23.3 fps
18,186 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 33,362,578 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 18,186 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Sapphire(174B E266) 15% 9% ± 0%
XFX(1682 7250) 14% 8% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0462) 14% 9% ± 0%
MSI(1462 3011) 13% 8% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B E269) 11% 8% ± 0%
Dell(1028 2120) 6% 8% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 2334) 5% 9% ± 0%
Asus(1043 04BD) 4% 8% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 2270) 4% 9% ± 1%
MSI(1462 3002) 3% 9% ± 0%
MSI(1462 3020) 2% 9% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 226E) 2% 9% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 2014) 1% 9% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 22BF) 1% 8% ± 0%
Diamond(1092 0250) 1% 9% ± 0%
Device(17AF 2001) 1% 9% ± 0%
AMD(1002 0123) 1% 9% ± 1%
PwrHis(1787 2012) 1% 8% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 2001) 0% 9% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical R7 250 Builds (Compare 7,590 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $92

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $250

Popular R7 250 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Good

12 months ago.

It's a nice card to turn a prebuilt into a budget gaming build.


Excellent

2 years ago.

extremely overclocked with custom cooling to 1235mhz and 1350ram and working so great with some fragments but only sometimes. For that money such a great value! (15.5%) and 170 fps on cs go.


Good

2 years ago.

Old, but still manages to pull of some impressive framerates in some games. Nice for kids PCs that can be in the living room without making much noise.


Good

23 months ago.

Decent GPU for an extremely low price used, good to add to an older Core 2 era PC or similar.


Poor

3 years ago.

One of the worst on the market


Good

2 years ago.

Awesome cheap addition to an office build. Enough power for some light gaming. For $50 you can't get any better.


Your
opinion?
643 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $299Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback