Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime29.6 Days
Run DateSep 12 '21 at 16:41
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 58.4
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 169
60% 107 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 372
46% 352 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.659.0
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Lighting 75.2
Reflection 71.9
Parallax 96.9
61% 81.3 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 68
Splatting 45.4
47% 59.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SH00E256GB 256GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 315 528 488 556 532 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 939
Write 293
Mixed 112
SusWrite 456
98% 450 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 14.8
83% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 443
DQ Mixed 216
214% 339 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 107%
Great: 181%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C14 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 11.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 0.7" 1028 720 LTM0000 HDMI TO VGA
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,737 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback