Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro16,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacBookPro16,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-E1008331FDC96864
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3072 x 1920 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '21 at 10:35
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9880H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 85.5
1-Core 107
2-Core 222
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 1,013
85% 735 Pts
64-Core 1,235
76% 1,235 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Apple(106B 020F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.45.40.10
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
41% Average
Lighting 53.6
Reflection 51.2
Parallax 72.9
44% 59.2 fps
MRender 43.6
Gravity 58.7
Splatting 33
36% 45.1 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41%
Great: 41%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asmt ASM236X NVME 1TB
680GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 227 230 234 233 233 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 407
Write 227
Mixed 242
SusWrite 229
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 17.7
56% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 142
114% 159 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 150%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 22.6
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 22.1
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 8 60 16" 1280 720 APPA044 Color LCD
Typical MacBookPro16,1 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Apple MacBookPro16,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback