HP Compaq Mini 311-1000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive18.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Mini 311-1000  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta 3651
Memory1 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090804
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 17 '21 at 18:18
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N270
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
19% Very poor
Memory 36.7
1-Core 6.8
2-Core 11.2
15% 18.2 Pts
4-Core 10.3
8-Core 11.5
2% 10.9 Pts
64-Core 10.7
1% 10.7 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 68 68 63 66 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.9% Very poor
Read 115
Write 66.5
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 65.5
18% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 6.2
30% 8.93 MB/s
DQ Read 38.4
DQ Write 20.2
DQ Mixed 28.8
22% 29.1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B2873EH1-C7 CT25664BC1339.M8FM 3GB
1066, 1066 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.11% Terrible
MC Read 3
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.3
8% 2.63 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 0.6
5% 1.7 GB/s
Latency 218
18% 218 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.11%
Great: 8%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Mini 311-1000 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Mini 311-1000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 10% - Terrible Total price: $42
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback