Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	17.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N270 3,302 User benchmarks, average bench 20% CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	Memory 40 1-Core 6.1 2-Core 10.6 16% 18.9 Pts	4-Core 10.3 8-Core 10.6 1% 10.5 Pts	64-Core 10.3 1% 10.3 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia ION LE 55 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 3651) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.38% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 0.1 1% 0.5 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.38% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 46 39 59 41 49 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.7% Very poor	Read 106 Write 66.4 Mixed 81.8 SusWrite 49.6 17% 76.1 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 7.7 4K Mixed 9.2 34% 9.63 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 82%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB 18,883 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 14GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.8 3.7 4.3 4.6 4.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	2.9% Terrible	Read 10.3 Write 1.5 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 4.3 7% 5.73 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.9% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B2873EH1-C7 CT25664BC1339.M8FM 3GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 1066, 1066 MHz 1024, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	7.66% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 1.8 7% 2.33 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 0.6 6% 1.93 GB/s	Latency 202 20% 202 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.66% Great: 8%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 16%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Atom N270IntelBench 20%, 3,302 samples	1x

GPU
ION LENvidiaBench 0%, 55 samples	1x

SSD
Vertex 3 120GBOCZ $42Bench 69%, 25,948 samples	1x

RAM
M471B2873EH1-C7 CT25664BC1339.M8FM 3GBSamsungBench 8%, 2 samples	1x

Value: 10% - Terrible

Total price: $42

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16