Performance Results


Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 5% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom Z3735E 10 User benchmarks, average bench 34% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Memory 31.5 1-Core 14.4 2-Core 29.3 17% 25.1 Pts	4-Core 57.6 8-Core 59.2 8% 58.4 Pts	64-Core 48.1 3% 48.1 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 0F31) 554MB Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.38% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.62 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.51 fps	MRender 0.86 Gravity 0.27 Splatting 0.61 0% 0.58 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.38% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MBG4GC 31GB 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.3 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.6% Very poor	Read 163 Write 51.2 Mixed 88.1 22% 101 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 9.42 4K Mixed 4.08 26% 8.02 MB/s	DQ Read 46.7 DQ Write 12.8 DQ Mixed 3.65 10% 21 MB/s

ST2000LM 003 HN-M201RAD 2TB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1.5TB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	19.8% Very poor	Read 35.4 Write 37.6 Mixed 34.4 46% 35.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 2.07 4K Mixed 0.38 86% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x1GB 12,162 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 1GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	4.44% Terrible	MC Read 1.6 MC Write 1.8 MC Mixed 0.3 4% 1.23 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 0.3 3% 0.93 GB/s	Latency 246 16% 246 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.44% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM