Asrock Z370 IB-R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 172%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 165%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics215% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z370 IB-R  (all builds)
Memory53.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191031
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 05 '21 at 14:03
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 76.8
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 249
75% 140 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 836
79% 655 Pts
64-Core 1,066
66% 1,066 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,135
Gigabyte(1458 4043) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
215% Outstanding
Lighting 317
Reflection 306
Parallax 365
258% 329 fps
MRender 358
Gravity 259
Splatting 196
213% 271 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 215%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 1TB SSD
652GB free
Firmware: CS303224
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 441 432 289 165 166 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 1,147
Write 428
Mixed 612
SusWrite 318
138% 626 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 6.2
65% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 286%
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$95
755GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0922FS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 11 373 414 445 442 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 498
Write 443
Mixed 393
SusWrite 293
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 37.8
127% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 71.3
DQ Write 92.6
DQ Mixed 0.6
23% 54.8 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 126%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 308 305 303 304 303 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
Lacie Mobile Drive 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 132 131 133 133 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 114
Write 103
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 131
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.9
218% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3000C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
69.7% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 21.8
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 22.2
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 24" 1280 720 AUS24A1 VG245
Typical Z370 IB-R Builds (Compare 875 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 IB-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $553
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback