HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3396
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime19.9 Days
Run DateOct 06 '21 at 02:10
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 89
2-Core 178
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 320
46% 335 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.7% Average
Lighting 55.3
Reflection 56.7
Parallax 49.2
45% 53.7 fps
MRender 42.9
Gravity 50.8
Splatting 45.9
38% 46.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFCE1A2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 51 32 66 30 64 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.3% Poor
Read 261
Write 66.3
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 44.3
24% 113 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 4.8
43% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 22.6
DQ Write 23.3
DQ Mixed 20.5
16% 22.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 85%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
854GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 291 420 448 456 456 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 460
Mixed 447
SusWrite 416
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 38.5
126% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 366
275% 368 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 101%
Great: 133%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25
919GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 126 145 145 146 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 127
Write 142
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 141
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 77%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.1% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 13.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 9.9
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 60 31.5" 1280 720 ACR0756 EZ321Q
Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback